top of page
Search

Training That Transfers: Universal Design for Learning for Workplace Programmes

Writer: Divergent Thinking
Divergent Thinking
Aug 10
4 min read

Updated: Aug 20


Most corporate training is polished, popular — and forgettable. Slides are tidy, feedback is warm, and yet behaviour at work barely shifts. Neuro-inclusive training solves the problem by designing for how people actually learn, not how we hope they learn. The best scaffold for this is Universal Design for Learning (UDL): multiple ways to engage, multiple ways to take in information, and multiple ways to show understanding (CAST, 2018). Done well, UDL reduces cognitive load, removes disclosure pressure, and — crucially — improves transfer to the job.


Start with the real performance you want

Training isn’t an event; it’s a change in what people can do. Before opening PowerPoint, write one sentence that finishes: “After this programme, people will reliably…”. Tie it to observable outcomes (fewer errors, faster cycle time, clearer decision notes). When goals are concrete, you can design materials and activities that target exactly those behaviours (Locke & Latham, 2002).


Reduce extraneous load so the brain can learn

Brains have limited working memory. If your materials are busy, jargon-heavy, or delivered at speed, you’re teaching format, not skill. Apply the multimedia principles: pair words with relevant visuals (not decoration), signal the structure, and remove anything that doesn’t directly support the learning goal (Mayer, 2020). Provide slides and one-page briefs in advance so people can preview at their own pace; this is a reasonable adjustment that benefits everyone.


Design with UDL’s three pillars

Engagement: Offer more than one way to join in — live discussion for those who think aloud, chat or sticky-note boards for those who think in writing, and private reflection prompts for those who need quiet time. State explicitly that all modes are valid; that single permission reduces masking.


Representation: Present core ideas in complementary formats — concise text, worked examples, and a short audio or video summary. This isn’t “learning styles” (a debunked idea; Pashler et al., 2008). It’s accessibility: different formats reduce barriers created by speed, sensory load, or reading differences.


Action & expression: Let participants demonstrate understanding in different ways — a short written note, a quick Loom, a before-and-after artefact from their job. You are assessing competence, not performance under a single modality.


Build practice that actually sticks

People don’t learn by being told; they learn by retrieval and application. Use low-stakes questions during the session to prompt recall (Roediger & Karpicke, 2006). Space practice over days, not hours; a short follow-up prompt 48–72 hours later cements memory (Dunlosky et al., 2013). Replace end-of-deck quizzes with real tasks: “Rewrite a recent client email using the decision template,” or “Run next week’s stand-up with the ‘signal–structure–silence’ format.” Small, authentic assignments beat hypothetical case studies.


Wheelchair access ramp with handrails beside an accessible parking space.

Make accessibility the default, not an afterthought

Caption live sessions, provide transcripts, describe visuals, and ensure all materials are screen-reader friendly. Offer camera-optional participation and state this upfront. Where the environment is high-stimulation, give quiet breaks and buffer time between segments. Under the Equality Act 2010, these are ordinary, proportionate adjustments; doing them by default removes the disclosure burden.


Engineer transfer into the workflow

Transfer isn’t a mystery; it’s a system (Blume et al., 2010). Before the programme, ask participants to bring a live piece of work to apply the method to. During the session, have them make a first pass. After the session, schedule a brief clinic or peer review where they present what changed. Provide job aids — checklists, templates, short videos — so people can perform without rummaging through decks. Finally, ask line managers to run a five-minute follow-up in their next 1:1: “What did you try? What worked? What should we adjust?”


Measure what matters

Stop counting smile sheets. Track behaviour and results tied to your goal: decision clarity scores, error rates, time-to-completion, or customer effort. Combine this with two short pulse questions a week later: “What did you use?” and “What got in the way?” Iterate your materials based on what people actually did, not what they said they liked.


A note on tone and safety

Adults learn best when they feel safe to experiment and fail in small ways. Set norms that questions are welcome, silence is allowed, and pauses are normal. Say, “You can contribute by voice, chat, or note; I’ll bring written points into the room.” That single sentence lowers cognitive load and invites genuine input.


The outcome to aim for

When you apply UDL, training stops being a performance and becomes a set of reliable moves people can use on Tuesday afternoon. You’ll see fewer clarification emails, cleaner decisions, and less frantic rework. And you’ll support neurodivergent colleagues without making them ask for permission to learn in the way that works for them.



References (APA-7)

Comments

bottom of page