Africa Dyslexia Organization: From awareness to applicable inclusion
A 90-minute online session brought school leaders, educators and community professionals together to explore neurodiversity, practical support and what inclusion looks like beyond good intentions.
An international learning cohort contains its own lesson about inclusion: the same idea must travel across roles, settings, cultures and levels of prior knowledge without losing its usefulness.
That was the opportunity in Divergent Thinking’s work with Africa Dyslexia Organization. The audience included people who shape learning and support in very different contexts. They did not need a lecture that assumed everybody started in the same place. They needed a clear foundation, practical examples and enough space to ask real questions.
At a glance
Partner: Africa Dyslexia Organization (ADO)
Delivery: 29 January 2026
Format: live, interactive online session lasting 90 minutes
Audience: a large international cohort of school leaders, teachers, non-teaching staff and community professionals; more than 100 people were expected
Session: Understanding Neurodiversity: Practical Tools for Mission-Driven Teams
Focus: neurodiversity awareness, support approaches and practical accommodations
Divergent Thinking role: tailored design, live facilitation, evidence-informed content, lived-experience insight and responsive Q&A
Further evidence: positive participant feedback, an organiser testimonial and a later published guest article
A partnership grounded in equal opportunity
Africa Dyslexia Organization works to raise awareness, influence policy and support people with dyslexia and related learning differences across Africa. Its public mission connects inclusive education with talent development and workforce opportunity. ADO’s work equips educators and families while challenging the stigma that can leave ability unseen.
That makes practical training especially important. Awareness is valuable, but a teacher, headteacher or community professional must still decide what to do with it on Monday morning.
Should instructions be broken into clearer stages? Could learners show understanding in more than one way? Has the environment made concentration unnecessarily difficult? Is a person being judged on the intended learning outcome—or on how comfortably they navigate an inaccessible process?
The session was designed to help participants ask better questions without reducing people to a checklist of traits.
Large-group learning can still feel human
Online delivery to a substantial international audience can easily become one-directional. Divergent Thinking chose a different rhythm.
The session moved between explanation, recognisable examples, reflection and questions. Complex concepts were translated into plain language. Common patterns were discussed without pretending that every dyslexic, autistic or ADHD person will share the same experience. Support was connected to the person, task and environment rather than to assumptions about a diagnostic label.
Rosalin Abigail Kyere-Nartey, Founder and Executive Director of Africa Dyslexia Organization, later highlighted the quality of that facilitation. She wrote that the training was “exceptionally well delivered” and praised Divergent Thinking’s ability to respond thoughtfully to a wide range of questions while grounding complex ideas in practical insights.
That combination matters. A facilitator needs enough structure to take a large cohort somewhere useful and enough responsiveness to meet the questions that emerge along the way.
The content balanced difference, support and possibility
The workshop introduced neurodiversity as natural variation in how people process information, communicate, regulate attention and experience the world. It then moved into what those differences can mean in education, community and mission-led settings.
Participants explored:
why neurodivergent experiences vary within as well as between labels;
how strengths-based language can sit alongside honest discussion of barriers;
why support should not depend on somebody proving their difficulty first;
how clearer structure can reduce cognitive load without reducing ambition;
practical accommodations in communication, participation and learning; and
the role of curiosity: asking what helps rather than deciding what a person must need.
The session resisted two easy stories. Neurodivergence was not framed only through deficit, and it was not romanticised as a guaranteed superpower. The more useful middle ground recognises real strengths, real support needs and the powerful effect of context.
Practical inclusion is designed into the route
Inclusive education is sometimes misunderstood as a change to the standard. Often, it is a change to the route.
A clear preview of an activity does not remove its challenge. A worked example does not supply the answer. Written, spoken and visual ways to contribute do not weaken the learning goal. They reduce avoidable barriers between a person and what they know.
The same principle appears in workplace guidance. Acas advises employers to support neurodivergent workers whether or not they have a diagnosis, listen to the individual and recognise that people with the same condition may need different adjustments.
For education and community settings, the practical translation can be simple:
preview the purpose, sequence and timing of an activity;
show an example before asking people to begin;
use precise instructions and explain unfamiliar language;
offer more than one appropriate route to participate;
notice sensory demands, transitions and processing time; and
summarise what matters so the learning can be revisited.
These changes make expectations more visible. That helps neurodivergent learners and often improves the experience for the whole group.
What participants and the organiser said
Feedback from the cohort included strong understanding and interaction scores, practical intentions and positive voices from education and community settings.
Toluwatope Laryea, a headteacher and cohort participant, distilled her response to two words:
“Just perfect.”
The organiser feedback gave more detail. Rosalin described the discussion as deeply engaging and said Divergent Thinking brought professionalism, commitment and care that aligned strongly with ADO’s standards and values.
“The way you handled the discussion, maintained momentum, and grounded complex ideas in practical, applicable insights made the session both engaging and highly valuable.”
Together, those responses show that the session worked at two levels: participants experienced it positively, and the commissioning organisation recognised the quality of the method behind it.
The learning continued in public
The relationship did not disappear when the online room closed. Africa Dyslexia Organization later invited Divergent Thinking to contribute an article for its wider community.
In March 2026, ADO published *From Awareness to Access: What Inclusion Actually Looks Like Day to Day*. The article extends the same central idea as the workshop: inclusion becomes credible when it changes ordinary access to information, participation and support.
That public follow-on is meaningful evidence of trust. The initial session was valued not only as an event, but as the beginning of knowledge that ADO considered useful enough to share with its own audience.
What other international cohorts can take from this case
Large, mixed audiences do not need generic content. They need a design that creates common ground while respecting difference.
The Africa Dyslexia engagement offers several transferable lessons:
Start with a shared foundation. Do not assume that role, seniority or personal experience produces the same understanding of neurodiversity.
Connect every concept to a decision. Ask what an educator, leader or colleague could change in response.
Use interaction purposefully. Participation should help people think, not reward the fastest speaker.
Keep individual variation visible. Traits can inform curiosity; they should not become a template imposed on a person.
Create something that can travel. A strong session can lead into resources, articles, follow-on conversations and local application.
This is how awareness begins to become access.
Planning international or mission-led neurodiversity learning
Divergent Thinking delivers neurodiversity training and workshops online and in person for education, nonprofit, public-interest and workplace audiences. Sessions combine evidence, neurodivergent lived experience and practical facilitation, then adapt the examples and interaction to the people in the room.
Contact nat@divergentthinking.uk to discuss the audience you need to reach, the questions they are already asking and the practical change the learning should support.
Comments